<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why haven&#8217;t I been taken seriously on www.gerrymay.com?</title>
	<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C.</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4868</link>
		<author>Nick C.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>Will "The Peacock" be your running mate?  Well, that could botch your chances of a Charlie Gibson endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will &#8220;The Peacock&#8221; be your running mate?  Well, that could botch your chances of a Charlie Gibson endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmy</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4866</link>
		<author>kimmy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>no, rick rowe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, rick rowe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jchristie</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4865</link>
		<author>jchristie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>So who was the viewer's choice during your first 35 years on the air? Jim Roberts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who was the viewer&#8217;s choice during your first 35 years on the air? Jim Roberts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherri</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4864</link>
		<author>Sherri</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kimmy.

According to my son, who was interviewed for tonight's 6pm sportscast on KTBS, I've been on the air for 80 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kimmy.</p>
<p>According to my son, who was interviewed for tonight&#8217;s 6pm sportscast on KTBS, I&#8217;ve been on the air for 80 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jchristie</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4861</link>
		<author>jchristie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4861</guid>
		<description>Viewers in the Arklatex have great foresight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewers in the Arklatex have great foresight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmy</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4860</link>
		<author>kimmy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4860</guid>
		<description>45 years in a row...wow  i thought sherri was just 35 so how is 'that' possible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45 years in a row&#8230;wow  i thought sherri was just 35 so how is &#8216;that&#8217; possible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jchristie</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4856</link>
		<author>jchristie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4856</guid>
		<description>"Virtual unknown"? Are you kidding me? She's the viewer's favorite news anchor as voted on in SB Magazine 45 years in a row!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Virtual unknown&#8221;? Are you kidding me? She&#8217;s the viewer&#8217;s favorite news anchor as voted on in SB Magazine 45 years in a row!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherri</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4851</link>
		<author>sherri</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Did you click on the election icon above?  As a candidate for president, I don't understand why there hasn't been much discussion about my campaign by our in-house political blogger, Gerry May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you click on the election icon above?  As a candidate for president, I don&#8217;t understand why there hasn&#8217;t been much discussion about my campaign by our in-house political blogger, Gerry May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4849</link>
		<author>Mel</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4849</guid>
		<description>I don't get this.  Do I have to go to Gerry's blog to know what y'all are talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get this.  Do I have to go to Gerry&#8217;s blog to know what y&#8217;all are talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherri</title>
		<link>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4847</link>
		<author>Sherri</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sherritalley.com/why-havent-i-been-taken-seriously-on-wwwgerrymaycom/#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>Hazel and Jimmy wouldn't vote to double their own pay even though there are two of them.  They legislate as one, even though Jimmy doesn't know squat about Robert's Rules of Order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazel and Jimmy wouldn&#8217;t vote to double their own pay even though there are two of them.  They legislate as one, even though Jimmy doesn&#8217;t know squat about Robert&#8217;s Rules of Order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
